Today we looked at The Night Mail, one of the documentaries considered to be a masterpiece of the British Documentary Film Movement. The British Documentary Film Movement was a group of filmmakers led by John Grierson (who
coined the term documentary after seeing 'Moana' by Robert Flaherty), and the group were influential in film during the 1930's and 40's.
I analysed camera shots, editing, sound and mise-en-scene in The Night Mail. The above picture is my analysis of this early documentary. I found that the main message/purpose of the documentary is to inform the audience of how the postage system worked during that time.
What similarities/differences does it have with contemporary documentaries?
Similarities:
- There was narration throughout the program, just as documentaries that are broadcasted now have.
- There are many cutaways to illustrate the person or narrator's point, to help the audience understand visually what is happening.
- There was quite a few landscape shots, usually to set the scene for the next part of the documentary, which is quite common in cotemporary documentaries.
- Facts and figures are a convention of documentary programs even from seventy years ago, as it helps give evidence for the person/narrators points and helps give the audience perspective.
- In terms of editing, The Night Mail used mainly fades and dissolves which most contemporary documentaries use in transitioning between scenes.
Differences:
- There was no interviews, in terms of vox pops or expert opinion, which most contemporary documentaries feature in them, usually to confirm what the person or narrator is saying.
- It used noticeable foley diegetic sound, which can be used in contemporary documentaries but it is usually hidden better.

No comments:
Post a Comment